Civil War Field Fortifications

Saps

Saps were particular types of trenches constructed in very specific ways for the protection of troops on service in the approaches against the point of attack of a besieged fortification. Saps were classified according to their method of construction as outlined below.


Simple Sap

This was the easiest type of sap to construct and could be accomplaished by working parties form of ordinary troops under direction of sappers and engineer officers. A simple sap was constructed by throwing the dirt excavated from the body of a trench forward on the side nearest the enemy to form a parapet. A berme about one foot wide was left at the base of the parapet to both keep the parapet from collapsing into the trench and to form a banquette. The earth forming the parapet was not rammed and the interior slope was not revetted unless the work was occupied for an extended period of time or the nature of the soil required revetting to maintain its form. The dimensions of a simple sap depended on the nature of the ground, the position of the sap in relation to the fortification's columns of fire, and the nature of traffic that would pass through the sap. Simple saps could be as shallow as three feet and as narrow as ten feet or as much as eight feet deep and twleve feet wide. The widest saps would be made to allow the passage of artillery so that it could be hauled through the trench to the battery positions adjoining the First or Second parallels. The First Parallel along with the boyaux leading to it from the rear and extending from it to the Second Parallel were usually constructed by means of the simple sap.


Back to Siege Works


Flying Sap

Flying saps were used when it was necessary to place working parties under cover as quickly as possible or when the slackness of enemy fire allowed the approaches to advance rapidly. A flying sap was constructed by placing a number of gabions side by side in a row and filling them all at the same time. Like the simple sap, a flying sap could be constructed by ordinary working parties under the direction of sappers and engineer officers. If the trench excavated behind the gabions was to be turned into a parallel the flying sap could be arranged for defense by construction of a banquette, if constructed for use as a boyaux, it would be left without a banquette.


Back to Siege Works


Full Sap

Full saps were employed when the approach trenches were within musket range of the covered way of the point of attack. A full sap was constructed by teams (called brigades) of eight specialist sappers who basically inched their forward on their hands and knees under cover of a large sap-roller while placing and filling one gabion at a time to advance the sap. This was dangerous and tedious work that required a fair degree of experience and team work to accomplish. British tests showed that four sappers working together required 15 minutes to place and fill one gabion and that the sap could be advanced as much as 8'10" an hour. As the gabions were filled they were crowned with fascines to bind them in place and dirt was thrown over and on top of the fascines to form a parapet.

Note: A full sap with gabions placed on one side of the trench was sometimes referred to as a simple sap in contradistinction to a double sap, which had gabions placed on both sides of the trench.


Back to Siege Works


Half Full Sap

A half full sap was constructed in the same way as a full sap by sappers working in four man brigades placing one gabion at a time, but without the cover of a sap-roller. The half full sap could be used when the head of the sap was not directly threatened by enemy fire. Demi-parallels run outward from the boyaux between the Second and Third parallels could usually be constructed by means of the half full sap.


Double Sap

A double sap was used when the approach trench was threatened by enemy fire from both flanks. Two brigades of sappers worked side by side under cover of two sap-rollers to plant their gabions one at time on both sides of the trench. Constructing a double sap was even more tedious and time consuming than the full sap since the two teams had to work in close proximity to each other and had to coordinate their activities so that both sap-rollers could be advanced at the same time without uncovering the head of the sap and exposing the sappers to enemy fire. Because of the difficulties involved in trying to alter the direction of two sap-rollers, double saps were usually directed along a straight line rather than in a zig-zag pattern. Traverses, which could either be placed on alternating sides of the trench or left in the center of the trench, had to be constructed at intervals to defilade the trench from enemy fire. When constructing traverses in the center of the sap the brigades on either side of the double sap worked independently of each other to reach the far side of the traverse where they had to rejoin and connect their sap-rollers to continue the sap. The high degree of coordination necessary for the brigades to complete their independent tasks almost always involved a loss of time when one brigade worked slower than the other, forcing the other to wait until the slower brigade finished its half of the traverse.


Half Double Sap

The half double sap was used when one side of a double sap was on significantly lower ground than the other, allowing enemy fire to pass over one side of the trench and strike the rear of the opposite parapet. A half double sap was advanced by one brigade of sappers behind one sap-roller with provisional gabions filled with sandbags placed on the low side of the trench. As the sappers worked their slowly forward, reserves followed behind forming traverses that branched out of the low side of the trench by removing the provisional sand bag filled gabions at intervals, placing them on the side of the branch trenches nearest the enemy, and throwing up parapets that were perpendicular to the general direction of the sap. These traverses allowed ordinary working parties to expand the trench to its full size while increasing the dimensions of the traverses and finishing the parapets around the outside of the perpendicular traverses. The rear of the high side parapet was thus defiladed by increasing the amount of soil excavated from the sap, using the extra soil to form more parapets  and altering the direction of the parapets on the low side to intercept enemy fire.


Back to Siege Works


Contents    Major Works    Minor Works    Glossary


Parallels    Lines of Circumvallation and Countervallation    Mortar Batteries    Trench Cavalier 


Copyright (c) PEMcDuffie 1998