|
To John Banister, Jr. Paris, October 15, 1785
DEAR SIR, -- I should sooner have answered the paragraph in
your letter, of September the 19th, respecting the best seminary for
the education of youth, in Europe, but that it was necessary for me
to make inquiries on the subject. The result of these has been, to
consider the competition as resting between Geneva and Rome. They
are equally cheap, and probably are equal in the course of education
pursued. The advantage of Geneva, is, that students acquire there
the habit of speaking French. The advantages of Rome, are, the
acquiring a local knowledge of a spot so classical and so celebrated;
the acquiring the true pronunciation of the Latin language; a just
taste in the fine arts, more particularly those of painting,
sculpture, architecture, and music; a familiarity with those objects
and processes of agriculture, which experience has shewn best adapted
to a climate like ours; and lastly, the advantage of a fine climate
for health. It is probable, too, that by being boarded in a French
family, the habit of speaking that language may be obtained. I do
not count on any advantage to be derived in Geneva, from a familiar
acquaintance with the principles of that government. The late
revolution has rendered it a tyrannical aristocracy, more likely to
give ill, than good ideas to an American. I think the balance in
favor of Rome. Pisa is sometimes spoken of, as a place of education.
But it does not offer the first and third of the advantages of Rome.
But why send an American youth to Europe for education? What are the
objects of an useful American education? Classical knowledge, modern
languages, chiefly French, Spanish and Italian; Mathematics, Natural
philosophy, Natural history, Civil history, and Ethics. In Natural
philosophy, I mean to include Chemistry and Agriculture, and in
Natural history, to include Botany, as well as the other branches of
those departments. It is true that the habit of speaking the modern
languages, cannot be so well acquired in America; but every other
article can be as well acquired at William and Mary college, as at
any place in Europe. When college education is done with, and a
young man is to prepare himself for public life, he must cast his
eyes (for America) either on Law or Physic. For the former, where
can he apply so advantageously as to Mr. Wythe? For the latter, he
must come to Europe: the medical class of students, therefore, is the
only one which need come to Europe. Let us view the disadvantages of
sending a youth to Europe. To enumerate them all, would require a
volume. I will select a few. If he goes to England, he learns
drinking, horse racing and boxing. These are the peculiarities of
English education. The following circumstances are common to
education in that, and the other countries of Europe. He acquires a
fondness for European luxury and dissipation, and a contempt for the
simplicity of his own country; he is fascinated with the privileges
of the European aristocrats, and sees, with abhorrence, the lovely
equality which the poor enjoy with the rich, in his own country; he
contracts a partiality for aristocracy or monarchy; he forms foreign
friendships which will never be useful to him, and loses the season
of life for forming in his own country, those friendships, which, of
all others, are the most faithful and permanent; he is led by the
strongest of all the human passions, into a spirit for female
intrigue, destructive of his own and others' happiness, or a passion
for whores, destructive of his health, and, in both cases, learns to
consider fidelity to the marriage bed as an ungentlemanly practice,
and inconsistent with happiness; he recollects the voluptuary dress
and arts of the European women, and pities and despises the chaste
affections and simplicity of those of his own country; he retains,
through life, a fond recollection, and a hankering after those
places, which were the scenes of his first pleasures and of his first
connections; he returns to his own country, a foreigner, unacquainted
with the practices of domestic economy, necessary to preserve him
from ruin, speaking and writing his native tongue as a foreigner, and
therefore unqualified to obtain those distinctions, which eloquence
of the pen and tongue ensures in a free country; for I would observe
to you, that what is called style in writing or speaking, is formed
very early in life, while the imagination is warm, and impressions
are permament. I am of opinion, that there never was an instance of
a man's writing or speaking his native tongue with elegance, who
passed from fifteen to twenty years of age, out of the country where
it was spoken. Thus, no instance exists of a person's writing two
languages perfectly. That will always appear to be his native
language, which was most familiar to him in his youth. It appears to
me then, that an American coming to Europe for education, loses in
his knowledge, in his morals, in his health, in his habits, and in
his happiness. I had entertained only doubts on this head, before I
came to Europe: what I see and hear, since I came here, proves more
than I had even suspected. Cast your eye over America: who are the
men of most learning, of most eloquence, most beloved by their
countrymen, and most trusted and promoted by them? They are those
who have been educated among them, and whose manners, morals and
habits, are perfectly homogeneous with those of the country.
Did you expect by so short a question, to draw such a sermon on
yourself? I dare say you did not. But the consequences of foreign
education are alarming to me, as an American. I sin, therefore,
through zeal, whenever I enter on the subject. You are sufficiently
American to pardon me for it. Let me hear of your health, and be
assured of the esteem with which I am, Dear Sir,
your friend and servant,
|