*** Index * < Previous page * Next page > ***
Lord Grenville lost the seat of
Prime Minister in 1765, but it was not because his plans to get American
colonists to pay their taxes had failed. It was more due to the fact that most
men agreed with King George III, who had
once mentioned (along with the thought that Grenville was an "insufferable
bore") that "he would rather have the Devil as a visitor of Buckingham
Palace than to be forced to listen to George Grenville"
[22]. Grenville did, however,
remain in Parliament and voted to tax the colonies every chance he had.
The Sugar Act and the
Stamp Act had failed to gain
revenue from the American colonists, but men were still in Parliament devising
plans of how the Americans would be convinced to pay.
William Pitthad a
plan to get Parliament to
forget about the colonists' refusal to pay taxes to
them for the time being by introducing a new idea involving
"The East India Company [whom] . . .
British military forces had supported. . . . [William Pitt, the earl of] Chatham . . .
proposed that the company should pay an annual rental to the government and that
the dividend policy of the East India Company should be regulated by the government
to prevent speculation in the company's stocks. [Furthermore], revenues from the
East India Company could have made up the national deficit and averted the taxation
issues with the American colonies"[23] .
This bill, however, was refused. The bold refusal of the American colonists was
a slap in the face for Parliament, and it was far from forgotten. A plan to
repay the debt was not enough. Parliament wanted a plan that would convince
the colonists to pay their taxes. This particular
test became a challenge, and in 1767 Charles
Townshend, a man seeking popularity, took that challenge.
Townshend was a man that had been around in Parliament to vote for the Stamp
Act when it was popular, and then voted to repeal it when doing so was the popular
thing [24]. No man in Parliament had
been able to come up with a plan that would convince the colonists to pay their taxes
since Parliament started paying attention to them after the
Seven Years War. Townshend decided
that the best way to increase his popularity was to get the American colonists to
obey Parliament and pay their taxes peacefully. In order to do this, he took into
consideration the speech that Franklin
had delivered several years earlier. Franklin had said that internal taxes were
too cumbersome, and that the people in the colonies would always oppose an internal tax.
An external tax, however, would be treated with a bit more respect in the colonies -- or
at least, that is what Parliament was led to believe. Townshend wanted to be the man who
extracted the desired taxes from the colonies, so he devised a plan which would involve an
external tax. "Charles Townshend . . . gambled an empire for the sake of popularity. . . ."
He decided that in "expressing their aversion to the internal taxes such as the Stamp Act,
[the Americans] had admitted the validity of Britain's right to impose
duties"[25] .
The Townshend Acts first involved the old
Navigation Laws.
Burke did not oppose these laws, as he had the
others introduced by Townshend, because he did not feel that the colonies
would protest against the Navigation Laws. They were "traditional commercial
regulations. They were the corner stone of British colonial policy; they protected
and promoted imperial commerce, to the benefit of mother country and colonies alike.
Therefore, Burke argued that the solution of the American controversy was easy.
Let Britain . . . 'be content to bind America by laws of trade' because she had
'always done it'"[26] . The
colonists had admitted many times that they did not mind paying a tariff that was
meant to regulate trade. They thought that tariffs were necessary for the success
of any country. Edmund Burke assumed that since the colonists had not objected to
the external taxes used to regulate trade before that they would have no objection
to them this time. He was partially correct. They were too upset about other things,
such as the "creation of the Board of Customs Commissioners under British control,
the sanction of searches by customs officials in homes as well as in stores and offices,
and, most objectionable of all, the establishment of an American civil list from which money
could be drawn for the payment of governors, judges, and other royal officials whose salaries had
previously been in the hands of the colonial
assemblies"[27] .
To placate the colonists as well as Parliament, Townshend said that the external
"duties when collected would be applied to the support of civil government in the colonies
and any residue would be sent to England"[28] .
This was designed to halt any complaint that the
money generated from these tariffs was going directly to the British Crown. There was, however,
enough controversy in that promise alone to give rise to boycotts all over the colonies, but
Townshend did not realize that, nor did anyone in Parliament. This idea was quite appealing to
Parliament. If this plan worked, they were finally going to regain control over the British
officials who had to live in the colonies, and the colonists would still be paying the salary of
these men. Unfortunately, the colonists realized that if England was the one that was actually
handing out the paychecks, so to speak, then they would loose to
England what control they had over the officials.
The Townshend Acts that caused so much trouble
in 1767 "proposed imposts on glass, paper, pasteboard, painters' supplies, and
tea"[29] . They were imposed as the external
taxes that Franklin had said would meet less opposition, but they were still opposed. The words of
Lord Grenville several years before must have echoed in the minds of every man who had been present
in Parliament at that time. He said, "I cannot understand the difference between external and
internal taxes. They are the same in effect and differ only in
name"[30] . How true those words were.
This time, the colonists were so serious about not purchasing anything with any tax on it that went
to the British government that they signed a pact amongst themselves stating that they would not
purchase any goods coming to the colonies from England.
When these tariffs were protested in the colonies, Parliament began to feel as though
"The colonial merchants demanded in effect free trade . . . or [at least] easy
smuggling"[31] . Free trade was something
that the mother country England did not even have. All Englishmen paid their taxes. There was
no one on English soil, even on the Island of England, who was exempt from any of these taxes.
Any sympathy in England for the colonists diminished significantly when they protested this set
of laws along with all of the other ones as well. And the realization that they would never
willingly pay their taxes to the British Crown turned out to be "the beginning of the
end"[32] .
The people in England who had at first supported the stubbornness of the American
colonists began to dislike them and their attempts to avoid their taxes at all costs. The
reason for this could be blamed on the Townshend Acts as well. Through the Townshend Acts,
the colonists were being pinched, and the English merchants were feeling the squeeze all the
way across the Atlantic Ocean in a land 3000 miles away. "The boycott on British goods,
particularly tea, threatened the livelihood of many English merchants. More and more sympathy
for America was confined to those narrow circles of forward looking men or to professional
politicians in opposition"[33] . But
those "forward looking men and professional politicians" were beginning to get frustrated.
The colonists were not allowing themselves to be taxed, the Townshend Acts were loosing support at
home because of the economic impact in England, and Parliament was running out of ideas. The
Townshend Acts were finally lifted, but the damage had already been done. It was just as Burke
had feared when they were first introduced to Parliament. "He [had] prophesied correctly that
the laws would" gain no revenue for England, but "only embitter the
colonists"[34] .
One law did remain intact when the Townshend Acts were repealed, and that was the
Tea
Act. This act remained because Parliament wanted to "[keep the Tea Act] for the sake of
principle"[35] , not for revenue. Burke had asked
that this law be lifted from the Americans because it was only causing a greater dislike of the English
in America and gaining absolutely no revenue, but the request was denied. This left a sore spot for the
colonists. They continued to despise the British rule over them, and eventually acted upon that hatred,
and gained a new set of acts for their trouble.
In an attempt to convince the colonists to adhere to the laws of Parliament yet again, the
Tea Tax was lowered once more. Tea was now less expensive in the colonies that it was in England.
"The tax on tea had been a continual irritant [in the colonies, and ] On December 16, 1773, the
famous Boston Tea
Party[36] expressed the dislike of British
rule. All of the tea that had been left on the merchant ships was dumped into the Boston Harbor in
response to this newly lowered tax on tea. Of course Parliament could not allow this type of
rebellion, the destruction of property, to go unpunished, so a new set of laws was created.
*** Index * < Previous page * Next page > ***